H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Benoit Paire holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benoit Paire leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benoit Paire won the 2014 Auckland third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2014* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Benoit Paire | 6-4 6-2 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Benoit Paire | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |