H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 4-1
Benoit Paire holds a 4–1 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Benoit Paire leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benoit Paire won the 2019 Lyon fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2019* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-4 6-3 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| May 12, 2017* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Pablo Cuevas | 7-5 0-6 6-1 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2017* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Benoit Paire | 7-5 6-0 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2016* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-2 6-4 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2015* | Bastad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-4 6-3 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |