H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 1-1
Benoit Paire and Santiago Giraldo are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Santiago Giraldo leads 1–0 on clay, while Benoit Paire leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Santiago Giraldo won the 2014 Hamburg third round 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Santiago Giraldo | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2013* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Benoit Paire | 6-4 6-4 | Santiago Giraldo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Santiago Giraldo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |