H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 0-2
Dominic Thiem holds a 2–0 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2017 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-4 6-0 6-2 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2016* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | F | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |