H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Bernard Tomic vs Evgeny Donskoy H2H: 1-0

Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeny Donskoy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Evgeny Donskoy
RUS Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernard Tomic #86 6-4 6-3 6-2 Evgeny Donskoy #114 Match data Jun 25, 2014* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Evgeny Donskoy #1,380 #65 764 1,793 52 113 31.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernard Tomic Evgeny Donskoy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #514 1,469 0 0
19 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #472 1,473 0 0
20 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1 2010 1–2 33.3% #259 1,513 0 0
21 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2 2011 0–2 0.0% #144 1,552 0 0
22 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3 2012 0–4 0.0% #81 1,482 0 0
23 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3 2013 12–19 38.7% #113 1,654 0 0
24 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3 2014 3–9 25.0% #130 1,546 0 0
25 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4 2015 5–5 50.0% #91 1,720 0 0
26 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4 2016 7–19 26.9% #125 1,653 0 0
27 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4 2017 5–14 26.3% #72 1,623 0 0
28 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4 2018 14–21 40.0% #97 1,641 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 3–6 33.3% #112 1,618 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #123 1,540 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 1–6 14.3% #172 1,573 0 0
32 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernard Tomic Evgeny Donskoy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2015 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 4 11 15 26.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 10 15 25 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0% — 42 78 120 35.0% 6 23 29 20.7% 4 12 16 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's and 162/165 of Evgeny Donskoy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernard Tomic Evgeny Donskoy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1% 2008 1/1 1.0 1.0 54.2% 61.5% 45.5% 33.3% — 54.2% 20.0%
19 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1% 2009 1/1 6.0 1.0 42.0% 81.0% 51.7% 57.1% 0.0% 64.0% 28.6%
20 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7% 2010 3/3 6.3 3.0 54.5% 67.1% 48.9% 65.2% 73.9% 58.9% 38.6%
21 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0% 2011 2/2 4.0 2.5 60.9% 72.9% 43.0% 31.3% 14.3% 60.3% 28.6%
22 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2% 2012 4/4 4.0 1.0 60.0% 64.9% 55.3% 52.5% 24.6% 61.1% 30.3%
23 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1% 2013 31/31 5.8 2.5 57.3% 72.2% 49.2% 63.9% 37.8% 62.4% 33.9%
24 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1% 2014 12/12 5.7 2.1 59.7% 70.7% 52.6% 57.9% 33.0% 63.3% 33.6%
25 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6% 2015 10/10 5.1 3.2 58.1% 73.3% 49.4% 61.9% 34.4% 63.4% 36.0%
26 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6% 2016 23/26 5.0 2.2 58.4% 67.7% 50.2% 55.6% 36.7% 60.5% 32.8%
27 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6% 2017 19/19 5.5 2.6 57.5% 71.6% 49.6% 54.2% 26.9% 62.5% 31.9%
28 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6% 2018 35/35 3.6 1.9 60.9% 66.0% 50.9% 62.7% 37.0% 60.3% 34.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 9/9 6.7 2.2 59.9% 73.9% 43.2% 60.5% 56.7% 61.6% 31.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 3.0 4.2 56.7% 68.8% 40.7% 48.5% 35.8% 56.7% 30.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 7/7 5.3 3.0 55.6% 70.7% 47.0% 53.3% 32.2% 60.2% 28.6%
32 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3% — 162/165 5.0 2.4 58.5% 69.8% 49.4% 58.7% 36.0% 61.3% 33.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernard Tomic Evgeny Donskoy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20 2007 1483 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.34 2008 1469 105.0 -0.44 -0.12 0.436 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
19 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.42 2009 1474 100.3 -1.05 -1.78 0.794 45.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.02
20 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.00 2010 1513 111.3 +0.09 -0.08 0.938 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.62 0–2 1–1 — +0.24
21 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.73 2011 1552 116.9 -0.88 -2.23 0.722 45.6% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
22 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) — +2.35 2012 1483 102.2 -1.07 -2.34 0.779 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.09
23 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) — +2.21 2013 1654 136.6 -0.81 -1.65 0.902 48.2% +1 -165 -44 43.7% -0.49 4–7 (36%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.05
24 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.82 2014 1546 122.5 -0.84 -1.27 0.914 48.1% +56 — — 37.5% -0.84 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.54
25 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) — +1.42 2015 1721 129.8 -0.73 +0.60 0.984 50.0% +8 — — 52.0% 0.00 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.65 2016 1653 128.2 -1.90 -3.06 0.831 46.7% -12 -76 -87 35.8% -0.96 2–8 (20%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.44
27 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2017 1624 132.0 -0.67 -3.10 0.850 46.8% +89 -116 — 25.0% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.25
28 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 2018 1642 136.4 -2.46 -2.27 0.857 47.6% -9 -50 -129 40.2% -0.85 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.64
29 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1618 122.8 -1.17 -2.19 0.810 47.4% +6 — — 30.4% -0.65 1–0 2–4 (33%) — +0.32
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1540 109.2 -2.48 -1.01 0.704 43.9% +38 — — 23.1% -2.16 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
31 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1573 116.3 -1.71 -1.82 0.719 45.4% +29 — — 23.5% -0.94 0–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
32 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 2022 1526 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1574 107.6 -0.90 +0.99 1.034 51.0% +27 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24 2023 1470 92.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30 — 1794 130.1 -1.40 -1.99 0.853 47.4% +16 -96 -87 36.5% -0.89 12–35 (26%) 29–42 (41%) 90.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.