H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Bernard Tomic vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 2-0
Bernard Tomic holds a 2–0 lead over Julien Benneteau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2013 Eastbourne fourth round 6-2 5-7 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2013* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Bernard Tomic | 6-2 5-7 7-6(4) | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2012* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2011 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-1 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2011 | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Julien Benneteau | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernard Tomic | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |