H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Bernd Karbacher vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 0-2
Daniel Vacek holds a 2–0 lead over Bernd Karbacher in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1996 Canada Masters second round 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1996* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Bernd Karbacher | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1993* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Vacek | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Bernd Karbacher | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernd Karbacher | #730 | #22 | 1,177 | 1,847 | 133 | 157 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernd Karbacher | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #39 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #57 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #217 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1998 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #117 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #637 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |