H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bill Bowrey vs Roy Barth H2H: 2-1
Bill Bowrey holds a 2–1 lead over Roy Barth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Bill Bowrey leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bill Bowrey won the 1972 Charlotte Wct third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1972* | Charlotte Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Bill Bowrey | 6-4 7-6 | Roy Barth | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1969* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Roy Barth | 6-4 2-6 7-5 | Bill Bowrey | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1969* | Southampton | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Bill Bowrey | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | Roy Barth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Bowrey | #264 | #162 | 0 | 1,752 | 122 | 114 | 51.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Roy Barth | #373 | #107 | 0 | 1,736 | 64 | 138 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Bowrey | Roy Barth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–11 | 59.3% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,730 | 1 | 3 | 1971 | 6–29 | 17.1% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,702 | 1 | 3 | 1972 | 1–26 | 3.7% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,695 | 1 | 3 | 1973 | 4–21 | 16.0% | #126 | 1,370 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 16–32 | 33.3% | — | 1,674 | 1 | 3 | 1974 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #136 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,661 | 1 | 3 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,601 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,566 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |