H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Phil Dent H2H: 1-1
Bill Scanlon and Phil Dent are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Phil Dent leads 1–0 on clay, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Phil Dent won the 1978 Indianapolis second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1978 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Phil Dent | 6-2 6-1 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1977* | Palm Springs | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Phil Dent | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Phil Dent | #726 | #17 | 0 | 1,953 | 418 | 351 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Phil Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 24–22 | 52.2% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 28–33 | 45.9% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 5–22 | 18.5% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 38–31 | 55.1% | #49 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #41 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #33 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #37 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #22 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #87 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #50 | 1,853 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #34 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #65 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |