H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Bill Scanlon vs Rod Frawley H2H: 2-0
Bill Scanlon holds a 2–0 lead over Rod Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1980 Surbiton fourth round 6-4 6-7 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1980* | Surbiton | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Bill Scanlon | 6-4 6-7 9-7 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1979* | Maui | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 6-2 6-4 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Rod Frawley | #483 | #43 | 0 | 1,812 | 112 | 145 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bill Scanlon | Rod Frawley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #173 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #86 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #44 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #87 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #100 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |