H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Bob Carmichael vs Robert Maud H2H: 2-0
Bob Carmichael holds a 2–0 lead over Robert Maud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bob Carmichael leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bob Carmichael won the 1972 Chicago Wct third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1972* | Chicago Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bob Carmichael | 6-2 6-1 | Robert Maud | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1971* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bob Carmichael | 8-9 6-3 9-8 | Robert Maud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Carmichael | #157 | #55 | 0 | 1,903 | 215 | 256 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Robert Maud | #326 | #57 | 0 | 1,804 | 123 | 131 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bob Carmichael | Robert Maud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–11 | 72.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 22–31 | 41.5% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 6–26 | 18.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1968 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #62 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1969 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #178 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1970 | 48–33 | 59.3% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1971 | 36–33 | 52.2% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1972 | 20–30 | 40.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1973 | 24–37 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1974 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #112 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1975 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #71 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1976 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #134 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1977 | 1–18 | 5.3% | #220 | 1,428 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |