H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Bob Hewitt vs Robert Maud H2H: 2-0

Bob Hewitt holds a 2–0 lead over Robert Maud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bob Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bob Hewitt won the 1969 Munich Open semifinal 6-1 6-1 7-5.

RSA Age 86 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 0
2 main draw meetings
RSA Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bob Hewitt 6-1 6-1 7-5 Robert Maud Match data Jul 26, 1969* SF Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Bob Hewitt 6-3 6-2 Robert Maud Match data Jan 12, 1968* R16 Bloemfontein ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bob Hewitt #669 #34 0 2,005 285 177 61.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Robert Maud #326 #57 0 1,765 123 130 48.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bob Hewitt Robert Maud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 29–11 72.5% 1,700 0 1
22 1969 21–10 67.7% 1,702 0 2
23 1970 23–13 63.9% 1,696 0 2
24 1971 22–31 41.5% 1,669 0 2
25 1972 6–26 18.8% 1,588 0 2
26 1973 8–16 33.3% #73 1,586 0 2
27 1974 12–13 48.0% #62 1,640 0 2
28 1968 51–15 77.3% 1,819 0 2 1975 2–10 16.7% #178 1,604 0 2
29 1969 31–11 73.8% 1,859 0 4
30 1970 41–16 71.9% 1,820 0 5
31 1971 22–10 68.8% 1,846 0 6
32 1972 52–16 76.5% 1,908 0 11
33 1973 2–5 28.6% #157 1,891 0 11
34 1974 13–17 43.3% #59 1,728 0 11
35 1975 27–15 64.3% #34 1,847 0 11
36 1976 11–22 33.3% #83 1,667 0 11
37 1977 29–25 53.7% #52 1,722 0 11
38 1978 6–21 22.2% #206 1,596 0 11
39 1979 0–3 0.0% #546 1,547 0 11
40 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,544 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bob Hewitt Robert Maud
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1968 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1969 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
24 1971 6 11 17 35.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1972 1 8 9 11.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 13 15 13.3%
26 1973 0 4 4 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2%
27 1974 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 7 14 50.0%
28 1968 19 6 25 76.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 20 7 27 74.1% 4 0 4 100.0% 1975 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 1969 3 1 4 75.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1970 12 3 15 80.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
31 1971 13 4 17 76.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1972 8 4 12 66.7% 24 4 28 85.7% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 6 13 53.8%
33 1973 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 1974 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
35 1975 5 4 9 55.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
36 1976 2 4 6 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
37 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
38 1978 0 5 5 0.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
39 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
40 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 74 46 120 61.7% 105 57 162 64.8% 60 31 91 65.9% 46 43 89 51.7% 38 39 77 49.4% 40 34 74 54.1% 27 20 47 57.4% 18 37 55 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bob Hewitt Robert Maud
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1700 120.9 +163 +11 -204 65.8% +0.93 6–4 (60%) +0.89
22 1969 1703 122.5 +258 +33 -167 66.3% +1.14 2–5 (29%) 1–0 +2.57
23 1970 1696 132.5 +234 -52 -5 60.2% +0.90 5–4 (56%) +2.00
24 1971 1670 137.5 +26 +7 +12 42.4% -0.42 5–11 (31%) 8–7 (53%) -4.04
25 1972 1588 132.9 -63 +83 23.6% -1.46 1–6 (14%) 0–9 (0%) -3.96
26 1973 1587 131.8 -7 +51 40.0% -0.72 4–7 (36%) 7–3 (70%) -0.85
27 1974 1641 124.4 -27 +18 +50 41.9% -0.73 8–3 (73%) 7–1 (88%) +0.16
28 1968 1820 126.5 +136 -148 -56 69.9% +1.44 15–6 (71%) +1.26 1975 1604 119.3 -74 +56 27.6% -1.69 1–4 (20%) 2–0 -1.13
29 1969 1859 141.4 +123 -19 -20 69.7% +1.56 3–4 (43%) -0.24
30 1970 1820 143.6 +238 +46 +34 67.5% +1.36 7–7 (50%) -0.83
31 1971 1846 128.5 +173 -27 66.3% +1.23 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) +2.83
32 1972 1908 140.8 -33 +104 -12 69.6% +1.43 14–4 (78%) 6–2 (75%) +2.46
33 1973 1891 121.7 -22 50.0% +0.83 1–0 0–2 -0.90
34 1974 1729 124.7 +61 +84 45.6% -0.01 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) -0.79
35 1975 1848 148.0 -54 +144 62.4% +1.13 6–4 (60%) 6–4 (60%) +0.13
36 1976 1668 136.3 -1 +183 37.9% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) -0.50
37 1977 1722 139.7 +65 +45 -79 53.3% +0.17 9–7 (56%) 7–7 (50%) +0.51
38 1978 1596 127.7 +107 +31 +90 25.9% -1.72 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) -2.33
39 1979 1548 96.3 14.3% -2.28 0–1 0–1 +0.38
40 1980 1544 106.3 0.0% -2.50 0–1 -0.22
Career 2006 142.5 +69 +58 -16 60.8% +0.87 68–48 (59%) 26–30 (46%) 97.3 +0.39 1766 134.9 +46 +23 -46 49.5% 0.00 32–44 (42%) 25–20 (56%) 102.5 -1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.