H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bohdan Ulihrach vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-3
Daniel Vacek holds a 3–1 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Long Island quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1999* | Long Island | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-2 6-3 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Daniel Vacek | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1997* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1996* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bohdan Ulihrach | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |