H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bohdan Ulihrach vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 0-1
Jiri Vanek holds a 1–0 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jiri Vanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jiri Vanek won the 2004 Sopot third round 2-6 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2004* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jiri Vanek | 2-6 6-2 7-6(5) | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bohdan Ulihrach | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |