H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Boris Becker vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 5-2

Boris Becker holds a 5–2 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Emilio Sanchez leads 2–1 on clay, while Boris Becker leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1990 Monte Carlo Masters quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Boris Becker
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Emilio Sanchez
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 1990* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Emilio Sanchez #11 4-6 7-5 7-6 Boris Becker #3 Match data
Mar 10, 1988* Orlando ATP 250 R32 Hard Boris Becker #4 7-6 6-4 Emilio Sanchez #18 Match data
Mar 7, 1988* Indian Wells Masters 1000 F Hard Boris Becker #4 7-5 6-4 2-6 6-4 Emilio Sanchez #18 Match data
Feb 22, 1987* Indian Wells Masters 1000 QF Hard Boris Becker #3 6-3 7-5 Emilio Sanchez #16 Match data
Jun 4, 1986* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Boris Becker #5 6-0 4-6 4-6 6-4 6-2 Emilio Sanchez #20 Match data
May 18, 1986* Rome Masters 1000 QF Clay Emilio Sanchez #34 6-3 6-4 Boris Becker #5 Match data
Nov 8, 1984* Wembley ATP 250 R32 Carpet Boris Becker #128 6-4 6-1 Emilio Sanchez #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Boris Becker #257 #1 4,297 2,266 670 219 75.4% 6 9 4 0 30 49
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,038 402 272 59.6% 0 1 0 0 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Boris Becker Emilio Sanchez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1984 11–11 50.0% #66 1,651 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 50–18 73.5% #6 2,066 1 3 — — — — — — —
18 1986 65–13 83.3% #2 2,229 2 9 — — — — — — —
19 1987 50–15 76.9% #5 2,040 2 12 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,545 0 0
20 1988 50–9 84.7% #4 2,180 2 19 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,668 0 0
21 1989 54–8 87.1% #2 2,232 4 24 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,841 0 3
22 1990 69–14 83.1% #2 2,206 4 29 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7
23 1991 46–13 78.0% #3 2,112 5 31 1988 39–19 67.2% #17 1,907 0 8
24 1992 48–15 76.2% #5 2,145 5 36 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,871 0 9
25 1993 42–22 65.6% #11 1,885 5 38 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,812 0 11
26 1994 50–17 74.6% #3 2,052 5 42 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,823 0 14
27 1995 51–18 73.9% #4 2,043 5 44 1992 40–25 61.5% #21 1,783 0 15
28 1996 42–14 75.0% #6 2,083 6 49 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,686 0 15
29 1997 17–13 56.7% #62 1,914 6 49 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,628 0 15
30 1998 15–11 57.7% #69 1,874 6 49 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,587 0 15
31 1999 10–7 58.8% #131 1,863 6 49 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15