H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Borna Coric vs Alexandr Dolgopolov H2H: 1-2
Alexandr Dolgopolov holds a 2–1 lead over Borna Coric in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexandr Dolgopolov won the 2017 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-4 3-6 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-3 6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | Borna Coric | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2015* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Borna Coric | 6-3 1-6 7-6(5) | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2015* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | Borna Coric | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Alexandr Dolgopolov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |