H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Borna Coric vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 2-1

Borna Coric holds a 2–1 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2018 Roland Garros third round 7-5 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Borna Coric
Croatia Age 29 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Schwartzman #12 7-5 6-3 6-3 Borna Coric #40 Match data Jun 2, 2018* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Borna Coric #79 6-3 6-2 Diego Schwartzman #41 Match data Apr 13, 2017* R32 Grand Prix Hassan II ATP 250 Clay
Borna Coric #35 6-2 6-1 Diego Schwartzman #75 Match data Aug 28, 2015* R16 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Borna Coric #237 #12 2,695 2,048 200 188 51.5% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Borna Coric Diego Schwartzman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2013 0–1 0.0% #303 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2014 6–5 54.5% #102 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2015 24–27 47.1% #44 1,824 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2016 21–21 50.0% #48 1,849 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2017 21–25 45.7% #48 1,801 0 1 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0
21 2018 35–19 64.8% #12 2,014 0 2 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0
22 2019 27–22 55.1% #28 1,833 0 2 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0
23 2020 15–10 60.0% #24 1,889 0 2 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1
24 2021 6–3 66.7% #73 1,896 0 2 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1
25 2022 16–12 57.1% #26 1,934 0 3 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2
26 2023 18–18 50.0% #37 1,789 0 3 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3
27 2024 11–18 37.9% #90 1,651 0 3 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3
28 2025 0–7 0.0% #115 1,575 0 3 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Borna Coric Diego Schwartzman
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 12 17 29 41.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
21 2018 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2020 11 6 17 64.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2021 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2022 13 7 20 65.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2023 9 10 19 47.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2024 8 12 20 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — —
28 2025 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 128 121 249 51.4% 60 53 113 53.1% 12 14 26 46.2% — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 385/388 of Borna Coric's and 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Borna Coric Diego Schwartzman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.9% 66.1% 35.9% 45.5% 40.0% 53.7% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 11/11 7.5 2.7 57.7% 74.3% 56.6% 63.7% 48.8% 66.3% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 51/51 3.6 2.3 59.2% 69.9% 49.5% 56.5% 43.6% 61.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 40/42 6.2 2.1 62.4% 70.2% 53.3% 57.8% 36.1% 64.0% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 46/46 6.1 2.6 62.6% 71.6% 53.5% 64.9% 36.5% 64.7% 34.8% 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9%
21 2018 54/54 5.9 1.9 63.9% 73.7% 56.7% 62.2% 47.5% 67.4% 38.2% 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9%
22 2019 48/49 7.4 2.5 62.7% 73.3% 53.8% 63.4% 45.3% 66.1% 35.2% 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2%
23 2020 25/25 6.8 2.0 64.1% 73.3% 53.3% 59.9% 47.7% 66.0% 37.5% 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5%
24 2021 9/9 9.1 2.0 66.5% 75.7% 59.2% 62.4% 33.2% 70.0% 35.2% 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0%
25 2022 28/28 6.8 1.8 61.8% 74.4% 53.3% 58.6% 38.2% 66.5% 34.3% 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4%
26 2023 36/36 4.7 2.1 59.8% 73.2% 50.5% 58.9% 39.0% 64.1% 33.9% 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8%
27 2024 29/29 7.0 2.3 61.0% 72.5% 51.9% 58.9% 37.6% 63.9% 35.8% 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4%
28 2025 7/7 5.0 3.7 58.1% 69.9% 47.7% 52.7% 40.7% 61.0% 28.4% 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5%
Career — 385/388 6.0 2.3 61.9% 72.4% 53.1% 60.3% 41.6% 65.0% 35.4% — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Borna Coric Diego Schwartzman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2013 1496 104.8 -5.62 -1.81 0.685 43.5% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 1647 135.5 +1.21 +0.82 1.117 52.1% +22 -71 — 62.1% +0.72 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 1825 148.4 -1.60 -0.26 0.897 48.1% -59 -72 -214 45.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 9–4 (69%) — -2.71 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 1850 153.7 +0.55 -0.45 0.974 49.2% -25 -61 — 48.0% -0.13 9–5 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.13 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 1801 150.5 +1.10 -0.60 0.987 50.0% -14 0 — 48.3% +0.03 6–10 (38%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.65 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04
21 2018 2015 171.3 +3.58 +2.92 1.171 52.4% -6 -182 -326 60.5% +0.93 10–7 (59%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.63 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40
22 2019 1834 148.1 +1.54 -0.54 1.038 50.4% +34 +2 -98 53.5% +0.21 16–9 (64%) 14–13 (52%) — +2.58 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.75
23 2020 1890 151.6 +2.06 +1.63 1.100 51.8% +45 -107 — 54.7% +0.47 4–1 (80%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.30 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.35
24 2021 1897 136.0 +3.17 -1.19 1.175 52.0% +41 — — 66.7% +0.52 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.32 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) — +0.94
25 2022 1934 157.0 +2.43 -0.11 1.026 50.3% +53 -155 — 55.6% -0.01 6–6 (50%) 10–3 (77%) — -0.53 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.44
26 2023 1789 143.1 +0.08 -1.32 0.943 49.0% +50 +85 -136 46.7% -0.26 6–5 (55%) 10–7 (59%) — +2.50 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.19
27 2024 1651 134.1 -0.08 -0.34 0.992 50.1% +41 +115 — 40.0% -0.36 2–6 (25%) 4–12 (25%) — +0.58 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.52
28 2025 1575 109.9 -1.95 -2.84 0.729 45.3% +14 — — 15.8% -1.79 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.33 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.93
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) — +2.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.53
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10
Career — 2048 158.1 +1.04 +0.08 1.010 50.1% +9 -38 -201 50.5% +0.04 69–62 (53%) 92–86 (52%) 100.7 +0.55 — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.