H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Borna Coric vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 2-1
Borna Coric holds a 2–1 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2018 Roland Garros third round 7-5 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Diego Schwartzman | 7-5 6-3 6-3 | Borna Coric | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2017* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Borna Coric | 6-3 6-2 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2015* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Borna Coric | 6-2 6-1 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Diego Schwartzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |