H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Borna Coric vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 1-2

Dusan Lajovic holds a 2–1 lead over Borna Coric in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dusan Lajovic leads 2–0 on clay, while Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2022 Madrid Open first round 6-3 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Borna Coric
Croatia Age 29 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Lajovic #77 6-3 4-6 6-4 Borna Coric #264 Match data May 3, 2022* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Borna Coric #26 6-3 6-2 Dusan Lajovic #27 Match data Mar 5, 2021* R16 ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Dusan Lajovic #84 6-3 6-7(1) 7-5 Borna Coric #54 Match data May 4, 2017* R32 Istanbul ATP 250 Clay
Dusan Lajovic #74 6-1 6-4 Borna Coric #53 Match data May 10, 2015 Q2 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Borna Coric #237 #12 2,695 2,048 200 188 51.5% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Borna Coric Dusan Lajovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2013 0–1 0.0% #303 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2014 6–5 54.5% #102 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2015 24–27 47.1% #44 1,824 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2016 21–21 50.0% #48 1,849 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2017 21–25 45.7% #48 1,801 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0
21 2018 35–19 64.8% #12 2,014 0 2 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0
22 2019 27–22 55.1% #28 1,833 0 2 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0
23 2020 15–10 60.0% #24 1,889 0 2 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0
24 2021 6–3 66.7% #73 1,896 0 2 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0
25 2022 16–12 57.1% #26 1,934 0 3 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0
26 2023 18–18 50.0% #37 1,789 0 3 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0
27 2024 11–18 37.9% #90 1,651 0 3 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0
28 2025 0–7 0.0% #115 1,575 0 3 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Borna Coric Dusan Lajovic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 12 17 29 41.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2018 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2020 11 6 17 64.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
24 2021 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2022 13 7 20 65.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2023 9 10 19 47.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2024 8 12 20 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2025 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 128 121 249 51.4% 60 53 113 53.1% 12 14 26 46.2% — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 385/388 of Borna Coric's and 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Borna Coric Dusan Lajovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.9% 66.1% 35.9% 45.5% 40.0% 53.7% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 11/11 7.5 2.7 57.7% 74.3% 56.6% 63.7% 48.8% 66.3% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 51/51 3.6 2.3 59.2% 69.9% 49.5% 56.5% 43.6% 61.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 40/42 6.2 2.1 62.4% 70.2% 53.3% 57.8% 36.1% 64.0% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 46/46 6.1 2.6 62.6% 71.6% 53.5% 64.9% 36.5% 64.7% 34.8% 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0%
21 2018 54/54 5.9 1.9 63.9% 73.7% 56.7% 62.2% 47.5% 67.4% 38.2% 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8%
22 2019 48/49 7.4 2.5 62.7% 73.3% 53.8% 63.4% 45.3% 66.1% 35.2% 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2%
23 2020 25/25 6.8 2.0 64.1% 73.3% 53.3% 59.9% 47.7% 66.0% 37.5% 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8%
24 2021 9/9 9.1 2.0 66.5% 75.7% 59.2% 62.4% 33.2% 70.0% 35.2% 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8%
25 2022 28/28 6.8 1.8 61.8% 74.4% 53.3% 58.6% 38.2% 66.5% 34.3% 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7%
26 2023 36/36 4.7 2.1 59.8% 73.2% 50.5% 58.9% 39.0% 64.1% 33.9% 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4%
27 2024 29/29 7.0 2.3 61.0% 72.5% 51.9% 58.9% 37.6% 63.9% 35.8% 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9%
28 2025 7/7 5.0 3.7 58.1% 69.9% 47.7% 52.7% 40.7% 61.0% 28.4% 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6%
Career — 385/388 6.0 2.3 61.9% 72.4% 53.1% 60.3% 41.6% 65.0% 35.4% — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Borna Coric Dusan Lajovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2013 1496 104.8 -5.62 -1.81 0.685 43.5% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 1647 135.5 +1.21 +0.82 1.117 52.1% +22 -71 — 62.1% +0.72 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 1825 148.4 -1.60 -0.26 0.897 48.1% -59 -72 -214 45.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 9–4 (69%) — -2.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 1850 153.7 +0.55 -0.45 0.974 49.2% -25 -61 — 48.0% -0.13 9–5 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.13 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 1801 150.5 +1.10 -0.60 0.987 50.0% -14 0 — 48.3% +0.03 6–10 (38%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.65 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
21 2018 2015 171.3 +3.58 +2.92 1.171 52.4% -6 -182 -326 60.5% +0.93 10–7 (59%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.63 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05
22 2019 1834 148.1 +1.54 -0.54 1.038 50.4% +34 +2 -98 53.5% +0.21 16–9 (64%) 14–13 (52%) — +2.58 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43
23 2020 1890 151.6 +2.06 +1.63 1.100 51.8% +45 -107 — 54.7% +0.47 4–1 (80%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.30 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53
24 2021 1897 136.0 +3.17 -1.19 1.175 52.0% +41 — — 66.7% +0.52 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.32 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.93
25 2022 1934 157.0 +2.43 -0.11 1.026 50.3% +53 -155 — 55.6% -0.01 6–6 (50%) 10–3 (77%) — -0.53 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.09
26 2023 1789 143.1 +0.08 -1.32 0.943 49.0% +50 +85 -136 46.7% -0.26 6–5 (55%) 10–7 (59%) — +2.50 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.07
27 2024 1651 134.1 -0.08 -0.34 0.992 50.1% +41 +115 — 40.0% -0.36 2–6 (25%) 4–12 (25%) — +0.58 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) — -0.10
28 2025 1575 109.9 -1.95 -2.84 0.729 45.3% +14 — — 15.8% -1.79 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.33 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) — +1.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.28
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.15
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1602 116.0 -1.24 -0.10 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45
Career — 2048 158.1 +1.04 +0.08 1.010 50.1% +9 -38 -201 50.5% +0.04 69–62 (53%) 92–86 (52%) 100.7 +0.55 — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.