H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Borna Coric vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 1-1
Borna Coric and Filip Krajinovic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Filip Krajinovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Borna Coric leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2019 Budapest quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2019* | Budapest | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Filip Krajinovic | 6-4 7-5 | Borna Coric | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Borna Coric | 2-6 6-3 6-4 6-3 | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |