H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Borna Coric vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 1-1
Borna Coric and Henri Laaksonen are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2017 Basel third round 6-7(8) 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2017* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Borna Coric | 6-7(8) 6-1 6-3 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2017* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 7-6(8) 6-4 | Borna Coric | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2017* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Borna Coric | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Borna Coric | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |