H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Borna Coric vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 1-1

Borna Coric and Henri Laaksonen are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2017 Swiss Indoors first round 6-7(8) 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Borna Coric
Croatia Age 29 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Henri Laaksonen
SUI Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Borna Coric #54 6-7(8) 6-1 6-3 Henri Laaksonen #94 Match data Oct 26, 2017* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard
Henri Laaksonen #94 7-6(8) 6-4 Borna Coric #57 Match data Oct 8, 2017* Q1 Q Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Henri Laaksonen #123 3-6 6-4 6-2 Borna Coric #59 Match data Mar 11, 2017* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Borna Coric #237 #12 2,695 2,048 200 188 51.5% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Henri Laaksonen #1,622 #84 798 1,836 37 64 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Borna Coric Henri Laaksonen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2013 0–1 0.0% #303 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2014 6–5 54.5% #102 1,646 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2015 24–27 47.1% #44 1,824 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2016 21–21 50.0% #48 1,849 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2017 21–25 45.7% #48 1,801 0 1 2012 0–2 0.0% #291 1,506 0 0
21 2018 35–19 64.8% #12 2,014 0 2 2013 2–4 33.3% #244 1,601 0 0
22 2019 27–22 55.1% #28 1,833 0 2 2014 1–3 25.0% #318 1,559 0 0
23 2020 15–10 60.0% #24 1,889 0 2 2015 0–2 0.0% #181 1,554 0 0
24 2021 6–3 66.7% #73 1,896 0 2 2016 2–4 33.3% #136 1,594 0 0
25 2022 16–12 57.1% #26 1,934 0 3 2017 10–10 50.0% #121 1,691 0 0
26 2023 18–18 50.0% #37 1,789 0 3 2018 5–4 55.6% #169 1,643 0 0
27 2024 11–18 37.9% #90 1,651 0 3 2019 6–8 42.9% #104 1,654 0 0
28 2025 0–7 0.0% #115 1,575 0 3 2020 1–5 16.7% #134 1,659 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2021 7–8 46.7% #98 1,796 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2022 3–14 17.6% #172 1,544 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Borna Coric Henri Laaksonen
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 12 17 29 41.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2018 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2020 11 6 17 64.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2021 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2022 13 7 20 65.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2023 9 10 19 47.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2024 8 12 20 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 2025 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 9 11 18.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 128 121 249 51.4% 60 53 113 53.1% 12 14 26 46.2% — 18 35 53 34.0% 19 27 46 41.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 385/388 of Borna Coric's and 100/101 of Henri Laaksonen's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Borna Coric Henri Laaksonen
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.9% 66.1% 35.9% 45.5% 40.0% 53.7% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 11/11 7.5 2.7 57.7% 74.3% 56.6% 63.7% 48.8% 66.3% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 51/51 3.6 2.3 59.2% 69.9% 49.5% 56.5% 43.6% 61.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 40/42 6.2 2.1 62.4% 70.2% 53.3% 57.8% 36.1% 64.0% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 46/46 6.1 2.6 62.6% 71.6% 53.5% 64.9% 36.5% 64.7% 34.8% 2012 2/2 6.5 5.0 42.4% 71.6% 36.6% 53.2% 25.0% 50.7% 29.3%
21 2018 54/54 5.9 1.9 63.9% 73.7% 56.7% 62.2% 47.5% 67.4% 38.2% 2013 6/6 3.2 3.8 57.3% 63.3% 51.5% 46.3% 47.3% 58.4% 36.0%
22 2019 48/49 7.4 2.5 62.7% 73.3% 53.8% 63.4% 45.3% 66.1% 35.2% 2014 4/4 2.0 8.5 63.3% 67.5% 39.4% 58.3% 39.3% 57.4% 40.4%
23 2020 25/25 6.8 2.0 64.1% 73.3% 53.3% 59.9% 47.7% 66.0% 37.5% 2015 2/2 2.5 4.5 53.4% 62.3% 43.6% 61.2% 27.8% 53.5% 34.3%
24 2021 9/9 9.1 2.0 66.5% 75.7% 59.2% 62.4% 33.2% 70.0% 35.2% 2016 6/6 3.3 3.5 55.3% 69.7% 52.1% 43.4% 41.7% 61.8% 37.0%
25 2022 28/28 6.8 1.8 61.8% 74.4% 53.3% 58.6% 38.2% 66.5% 34.3% 2017 20/20 7.7 5.4 59.5% 73.5% 46.6% 56.6% 40.6% 62.7% 36.5%
26 2023 36/36 4.7 2.1 59.8% 73.2% 50.5% 58.9% 39.0% 64.1% 33.9% 2018 9/9 4.4 3.9 61.8% 68.2% 53.9% 63.8% 53.0% 61.1% 39.9%
27 2024 29/29 7.0 2.3 61.0% 72.5% 51.9% 58.9% 37.6% 63.9% 35.8% 2019 14/14 6.4 3.4 57.0% 69.0% 50.3% 55.4% 33.4% 60.9% 36.0%
28 2025 7/7 5.0 3.7 58.1% 69.9% 47.7% 52.7% 40.7% 61.0% 28.4% 2020 6/6 5.7 2.2 59.3% 71.1% 43.7% 47.4% 39.6% 60.2% 33.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 14/15 7.2 3.1 54.9% 72.9% 48.9% 52.7% 42.6% 62.4% 36.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 17/17 4.4 2.4 57.0% 64.3% 44.8% 51.6% 26.2% 56.2% 30.8%
Career — 385/388 6.0 2.3 61.9% 72.4% 53.1% 60.3% 41.6% 65.0% 35.4% — 100/101 5.6 3.9 57.6% 69.3% 47.7% 53.8% 38.3% 60.1% 35.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Borna Coric Henri Laaksonen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2013 1496 104.8 -5.62 -1.81 0.685 43.5% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 1647 135.5 +1.21 +0.82 1.117 52.1% +22 -71 — 62.1% +0.72 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 1825 148.4 -1.60 -0.26 0.897 48.1% -59 -72 -214 45.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 9–4 (69%) — -2.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 1850 153.7 +0.55 -0.45 0.974 49.2% -25 -61 — 48.0% -0.13 9–5 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.13 2011 1499 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 1801 150.5 +1.10 -0.60 0.987 50.0% -14 0 — 48.3% +0.03 6–10 (38%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.65 2012 1506 107.9 -2.65 -1.33 0.595 41.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15
21 2018 2015 171.3 +3.58 +2.92 1.171 52.4% -6 -182 -326 60.5% +0.93 10–7 (59%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.63 2013 1601 120.9 -0.84 -1.22 0.865 47.2% — +81 — 28.6% -0.57 2–0 0–2 — +0.11
22 2019 1834 148.1 +1.54 -0.54 1.038 50.4% +34 +2 -98 53.5% +0.21 16–9 (64%) 14–13 (52%) — +2.58 2014 1559 114.0 -2.21 -0.70 0.949 48.9% — +71 — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.57
23 2020 1890 151.6 +2.06 +1.63 1.100 51.8% +45 -107 — 54.7% +0.47 4–1 (80%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.30 2015 1555 105.9 -0.83 -2.10 0.738 44.3% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.13
24 2021 1897 136.0 +3.17 -1.19 1.175 52.0% +41 — — 66.7% +0.52 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.32 2016 1594 113.4 -1.15 -0.44 0.968 48.8% +5 +32 — 25.0% -1.67 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
25 2022 1934 157.0 +2.43 -0.11 1.026 50.3% +53 -155 — 55.6% -0.01 6–6 (50%) 10–3 (77%) — -0.53 2017 1691 136.9 -0.97 +0.26 0.980 49.9% +2 -37 — 48.1% -0.06 5–4 (56%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.07
26 2023 1789 143.1 +0.08 -1.32 0.943 49.0% +50 +85 -136 46.7% -0.26 6–5 (55%) 10–7 (59%) — +2.50 2018 1644 113.9 -2.10 +2.55 1.026 50.7% — +53 — 52.4% +0.29 2–1 (67%) — — +0.03
27 2024 1651 134.1 -0.08 -0.34 0.992 50.1% +41 +115 — 40.0% -0.36 2–6 (25%) 4–12 (25%) — +0.58 2019 1655 122.8 -1.52 +0.53 0.920 48.5% -41 +57 — 43.6% -0.69 1–1 6–3 (67%) — +0.45
28 2025 1575 109.9 -1.95 -2.84 0.729 45.3% +14 — — 15.8% -1.79 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.33 2020 1659 122.4 -2.11 -1.75 0.841 46.8% -44 — — 29.4% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.21
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1796 124.5 -0.16 -0.41 0.980 49.6% -116 +77 — 52.5% +0.20 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.27
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1545 111.8 -4.15 -4.45 0.704 44.1% +47 +124 — 19.5% -2.15 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1507 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2048 158.1 +1.04 +0.08 1.010 50.1% +9 -38 -201 50.5% +0.04 69–62 (53%) 92–86 (52%) 100.7 +0.55 — 1836 124.9 -1.73 -0.76 0.892 48.0% -16 +59 — 38.8% -0.71 15–17 (47%) 22–19 (54%) 105.4 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.