H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Borna Gojo vs Ruben Bemelmans

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Borna Gojo vs Ruben Bemelmans.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Borna Gojo
Croatia Age 28 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Ruben Bemelmans
BEL Age 38 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Borna Gojo 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(6) Ruben Bemelmans #100 Match data Aug 20, 2017* Q1 Q Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Borna Gojo #162 #72 751 1,766 8 21 27.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ruben Bemelmans #1,092 #84 628 1,756 23 49 31.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Borna Gojo Ruben Bemelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2018 0–1 0.0% — 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — 2010 1–4 20.0% #178 1,597 0 0
23 2021 0–2 0.0% #284 1,530 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #160 1,634 0 0
24 2022 2–3 40.0% #144 1,610 0 0 2012 3–6 33.3% #111 1,648 0 0
25 2023 6–8 42.9% #72 1,758 0 0 2013 3–5 37.5% #148 1,637 0 0
26 2024 0–2 0.0% #447 1,705 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2025 0–5 0.0% #295 1,646 0 0 2015 3–8 27.3% #108 1,695 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 2–2 50.0% #167 1,645 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 5–5 50.0% #118 1,694 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 5–14 26.3% #117 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 0–2 0.0% #260 1,590 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Borna Gojo Ruben Bemelmans
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2023 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
26 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2015 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 11 14 21.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 7 13 20 35.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 16 32 48 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 14 20 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Borna Gojo Ruben Bemelmans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2018 1/1 1.0 4.0 63.2% 61.1% 52.4% 57.1% 0.0% 57.9% 24.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 5/5 7.0 1.0 67.7% 70.3% 43.5% 71.5% 35.7% 61.8% 32.4%
23 2021 2/2 19.0 5.5 68.8% 74.9% 51.4% 72.2% 26.8% 67.3% 32.6% 2011 4/4 4.5 4.5 58.7% 73.6% 49.1% 67.8% 37.1% 63.3% 34.2%
24 2022 5/5 11.6 7.4 63.3% 74.0% 44.0% 65.9% 24.7% 62.9% 35.4% 2012 9/9 5.7 3.7 60.7% 68.7% 48.3% 56.0% 49.7% 60.7% 35.4%
25 2023 14/14 13.1 2.9 66.1% 78.0% 54.1% 64.8% 38.5% 69.6% 34.7% 2013 8/8 8.0 3.3 65.0% 73.1% 50.6% 69.6% 37.6% 65.5% 36.9%
26 2024 2/2 11.0 4.0 61.2% 67.7% 49.0% 16.7% 31.3% 60.5% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 5/5 7.8 1.8 65.6% 71.0% 50.2% 49.2% 44.8% 64.0% 32.8% 2015 11/11 7.3 4.5 62.0% 72.0% 51.2% 51.1% 35.3% 64.2% 30.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 4/4 6.5 2.3 68.6% 65.9% 50.7% 76.7% 55.0% 61.0% 31.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 10/10 6.6 2.4 65.3% 68.5% 53.9% 53.6% 31.4% 63.1% 32.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/19 5.8 3.2 65.4% 66.5% 47.0% 59.4% 38.4% 59.9% 33.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 0.5 1.5 65.5% 57.5% 42.9% 48.7% 25.0% 52.5% 28.0%
Career — 29/29 11.8 3.8 65.3% 74.6% 51.1% 59.2% 34.6% 66.3% 33.6% — 72/72 6.3 3.2 64.2% 69.0% 49.1% 60.0% 38.6% 61.9% 33.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Borna Gojo Ruben Bemelmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2017 1507 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1502 104.6 -2.48 +0.15 0.572 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 1506 101.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1500 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1597 122.5 +0.88 -0.33 0.848 47.3% +32 — — 38.5% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
23 2021 1531 109.4 -0.60 +1.06 0.999 49.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 2011 1634 112.3 +0.10 -0.35 0.931 49.4% — — +60 46.2% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05
24 2022 1611 117.5 -0.86 -0.61 0.955 49.2% -14 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.17 2012 1648 118.1 -1.91 -0.07 0.901 48.3% -38 — +135 40.0% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.13
25 2023 1759 134.7 +3.14 -0.17 1.142 51.6% +19 — — 50.0% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.57 2013 1638 125.5 +0.65 0.00 1.070 51.5% +20 — — 42.9% +0.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.14
26 2024 1706 104.3 -0.20 +0.56 0.757 45.8% — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — -0.05 2014 1628 113.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 1647 113.2 -0.26 -0.32 0.911 48.2% — +4 — 28.6% -0.71 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — -0.79 2015 1695 124.5 -1.03 -1.29 0.860 47.4% +26 — — 27.6% -1.28 0–2 2–4 (33%) — -0.88
28 2026 1617 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1646 110.6 -0.49 -2.17 0.800 48.0% +6 — — 46.2% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.19
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1694 125.7 -0.20 -0.85 0.870 48.1% -61 — +90 41.9% -0.45 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1686 128.9 -2.91 -1.28 0.833 47.2% -22 — +111 35.2% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.61
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 108.5 -1.92 +0.26 0.590 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1599 107.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1552 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1518 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1767 123.6 +1.18 -0.13 0.999 49.7% +12 +4 — 41.0% -0.36 3–12 (20%) 6–12 (33%) 89.8 -4.72 — 1756 123.9 -1.13 -0.82 0.871 48.0% -8 — +101 37.3% -0.70 9–20 (31%) 15–23 (39%) 89.1 -2.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.