H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Aslan Karatsev H2H: 1-1
Botic van de Zandschulp and Aslan Karatsev are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Aslan Karatsev won the 2023 Madrid Masters second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Russia
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2023* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Aslan Karatsev | 6-2 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2023* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-2 6-0 | Aslan Karatsev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aslan Karatsev | #369 | #14 | 2,633 | 1,985 | 78 | 86 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Aslan Karatsev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #18 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 17–29 | 37.0% | #59 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #287 | 1,681 | 0 | 3 |