H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Christopher Eubanks H2H: 2-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–0 lead over Christopher Eubanks in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2024 Madrid Masters first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
United States
Age 30
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2024* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 6-3 | Christopher Eubanks | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2024* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Christopher Eubanks | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Christopher Eubanks | #420 | #29 | 1,358 | 1,928 | 43 | 67 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Christopher Eubanks | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #649 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #347 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #228 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #160 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |