H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Emil Ruusuvuori H2H: 1-2
Emil Ruusuvuori holds a 2–1 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Emil Ruusuvuori leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emil Ruusuvuori won the 2023 Miami Masters fourth round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Finland
Age 27
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2023* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Emil Ruusuvuori | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Botic van de Zandschulp | 3-6 6-1 6-4 6-4 | Emil Ruusuvuori | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2022* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Emil Ruusuvuori | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emil Ruusuvuori | #545 | #37 | 1,041 | 1,886 | 97 | 98 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Emil Ruusuvuori | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #95 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |