H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 10:33 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Emilio Nava H2H: 0-1
Emilio Nava holds a 1–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilio Nava leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilio Nava won the 2025 Roland Garros first round 6-2 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2025* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Emilio Nava | 6-2 7-5 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emilio Nava | #91 | #74 | 753 | 1,715 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Emilio Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #212 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #91 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |