H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Illya Marchenko

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Botic van de Zandschulp vs Illya Marchenko.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Botic van de Zandschulp
Netherlands Age 30 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Illya Marchenko
Ukraine Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Botic van de Zandschulp #154 6-1 6-2 Illya Marchenko #161 Match data May 31, 2021 Q3 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Botic van de Zandschulp #70 #22 1,573 1,933 121 122 49.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Illya Marchenko #1,347 #49 905 1,805 50 83 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Illya Marchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2009 4–3 57.1% #120 1,638 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 17–21 44.7% #81 1,715 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2011 5–9 35.7% #229 1,554 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #140 1,565 0 0
25 2021 15–10 60.0% #57 1,854 0 0 2013 0–4 0.0% #165 1,517 0 0
26 2022 34–28 54.8% #35 1,836 0 0 2014 2–4 33.3% #143 1,645 0 0
27 2023 20–24 45.5% #50 1,792 0 0 2015 3–7 30.0% #94 1,738 0 0
28 2024 14–22 38.9% #80 1,778 0 0 2016 14–20 41.2% #74 1,699 0 0
29 2025 16–20 44.4% #77 1,715 0 0 2017 2–6 25.0% #196 1,669 0 0
30 2026 22–18 55.0% #70 1,778 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #215 1,554 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 3–6 33.3% #163 1,639 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #220 1,570 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Illya Marchenko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2021 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2022 18 17 35 51.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2023 15 15 30 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2024 8 14 22 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 12 14 26 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2025 10 13 23 43.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2026 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 76 153 50.3% 32 32 64 50.0% 12 14 26 46.2% — 41 57 98 41.8% 3 10 13 23.1% 6 16 22 27.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/244 of Botic van de Zandschulp's and 131/133 of Illya Marchenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Illya Marchenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 7/7 1.7 3.3 57.3% 70.2% 48.5% 48.6% 52.6% 61.0% 36.3%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 37/38 3.7 3.6 59.0% 69.8% 47.9% 57.7% 40.9% 60.7% 38.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 4.3 4.1 56.5% 67.2% 49.3% 50.4% 40.9% 59.3% 39.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 2.0 18.0 55.1% 68.0% 43.0% 68.4% 30.8% 56.8% 38.7%
25 2021 25/25 7.0 4.4 62.4% 75.0% 49.1% 62.9% 32.0% 65.1% 35.5% 2013 4/4 3.3 6.3 58.2% 66.7% 42.9% 50.6% 40.0% 56.4% 34.2%
26 2022 62/62 6.5 3.9 63.4% 71.7% 49.1% 59.5% 43.9% 63.1% 38.8% 2014 6/6 8.3 5.3 60.7% 71.2% 48.9% 57.2% 28.9% 62.4% 34.7%
27 2023 44/44 5.7 3.6 62.8% 69.5% 47.5% 58.2% 36.3% 61.1% 38.0% 2015 10/10 6.2 3.8 58.4% 73.5% 50.1% 61.7% 35.0% 63.7% 31.7%
28 2024 36/36 4.7 3.9 60.9% 69.3% 43.7% 60.4% 41.8% 59.3% 36.8% 2016 33/34 5.1 4.5 56.8% 72.8% 46.5% 59.1% 45.8% 61.2% 33.9%
29 2025 35/36 5.6 4.8 60.9% 73.1% 47.4% 52.3% 41.4% 63.1% 37.5% 2017 8/8 7.0 3.6 58.7% 75.7% 48.5% 39.7% 30.2% 63.8% 36.1%
30 2026 40/41 7.1 4.8 62.1% 73.6% 45.9% 65.0% 46.6% 63.3% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 4.0 4.0 67.0% 63.4% 60.0% 57.1% 20.0% 62.3% 31.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 9/9 6.3 3.1 58.2% 71.9% 56.1% 42.5% 37.6% 65.4% 33.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 2.0 3.0 50.7% 58.3% 48.6% 40.0% 30.8% 53.5% 43.4%
Career — 242/244 6.1 4.2 62.2% 71.8% 47.2% 59.6% 41.0% 62.4% 37.8% — 131/133 4.8 4.1 58.0% 70.9% 48.4% 54.7% 40.5% 61.3% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Illya Marchenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1508 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 1516 105.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1639 117.6 -1.58 -1.13 0.931 49.0% +29 — — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.62
22 2018 1492 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1715 132.0 -2.67 +1.26 0.984 49.7% +28 -198 -106 43.5% -0.58 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.30
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1555 114.4 -1.74 -0.44 0.963 49.3% +52 — +25 44.4% -0.36 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.12
24 2020 1480 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1565 106.3 -2.41 +0.75 0.896 47.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.11
25 2021 1855 136.1 +1.69 +0.20 1.015 50.0% -21 — — 53.2% +0.18 6–3 (67%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.41 2013 1518 113.5 -1.02 -1.71 0.784 45.6% — — — 18.2% -1.91 0–2 — — +0.03
26 2022 1836 154.1 +0.18 +2.55 1.051 50.8% -34 -42 -60 52.7% +0.19 9–8 (53%) 16–9 (64%) — -1.63 2014 1645 119.3 -0.79 -0.98 0.924 48.5% +39 — — 37.5% -0.81 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.19
27 2023 1793 143.4 -2.02 +2.12 0.976 49.5% +31 -62 -91 44.6% -0.30 10–7 (59%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.41 2015 1738 126.2 -0.75 -0.78 0.871 48.2% +20 — -41 37.0% -0.52 0–4 (0%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.40
28 2024 1779 143.2 -3.37 +1.62 0.904 48.2% +15 -55 -84 38.8% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.47 2016 1700 139.2 -2.01 -2.13 0.875 47.9% +54 -162 — 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.33
29 2025 1715 142.0 -0.75 +1.66 1.018 50.0% +27 -14 — 45.7% -0.22 6–8 (43%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.80 2017 1669 127.5 -0.17 +0.95 0.997 49.2% +22 — — 33.3% -0.62 0–2 1–6 (14%) — -0.39
30 2026 1779 145.0 -0.75 +2.62 1.057 51.2% +42 -74 -137 56.3% +0.39 4–8 (33%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.06 2018 1575 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1560 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1554 110.8 -1.11 +2.54 0.828 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1640 121.4 -0.40 -1.31 0.977 49.4% +18 — — 45.5% -0.32 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1591 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1570 101.6 -0.11 -2.92 0.934 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.05
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1493 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 148.6 -0.88 +1.97 1.006 50.0% +8 -49 -86 48.9% -0.06 38–38 (50%) 62–53 (54%) 105.3 -2.45 — 1806 126.0 -1.72 -0.47 0.932 48.8% +36 -174 -50 40.5% -0.61 12–32 (27%) 29–33 (47%) 90.1 +0.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.