H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Ilya Ivashka H2H: 2-1
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–1 lead over Ilya Ivashka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ilya Ivashka won the 2023 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-5 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Belarus
Age 32
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2023* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ilya Ivashka | 7-5 3-2 (ret.) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2023* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-2 7-5 | Ilya Ivashka | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2023* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Ilya Ivashka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ilya Ivashka | #791 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,951 | 78 | 83 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Ilya Ivashka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #131 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #48 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |