H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp and Liam Broady are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on grass, while Liam Broady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2024 Wimbledon first round 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Liam Broady | Match data | Jul 3, 2024* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Liam Broady | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Sep 30, 2022* | R16 | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Liam Broady | 7-6(5) 7-6(8) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Sep 28, 2020 | Q2 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Liam Broady | #197 | #93 | 657 | 1,734 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Liam Broady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #301 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #163 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #70 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #546 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Liam Broady | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2020 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2021 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2022 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 29 | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2023 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2026 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2024 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 77 | 76 | 153 | 50.3% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | — | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's and 51/55 of Liam Broady's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Liam Broady | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 54.5% | 58.3% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 45.5% | 22.7% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2/2 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 56.2% | 68.7% | 44.6% | 66.8% | 43.4% | 58.2% | 33.0% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 66.7% | 63.4% | 55.3% | 63.9% | 11.1% | 60.8% | 28.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4/4 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 66.3% | 65.9% | 60.5% | 57.9% | 45.5% | 62.8% | 41.4% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 59.6% | 59.2% | 39.5% | 36.6% | 53.3% | 51.0% | 33.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% | 2020 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 62.1% | 67.1% | 38.0% | 60.0% | 66.7% | 56.1% | 27.5% |
| 27 | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% | 2021 | 8/11 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 66.1% | 65.0% | 51.4% | 58.3% | 36.2% | 60.4% | 38.2% |
| 28 | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% | 2022 | 12/13 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 62.2% | 67.1% | 51.5% | 55.0% | 39.1% | 61.1% | 33.1% |
| 29 | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% | 2023 | 13/13 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 55.7% | 69.1% | 47.5% | 50.7% | 39.8% | 59.2% | 37.2% |
| 30 | 2026 | 40/40 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 62.1% | 73.6% | 45.9% | 65.0% | 46.6% | 63.3% | 38.9% | 2024 | 5/5 | 3.6 | 5.0 | 59.9% | 63.8% | 48.5% | 69.9% | 43.8% | 57.9% | 36.8% |
| Career | — | 242/243 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.8% | 47.2% | 59.6% | 41.0% | 62.4% | 37.8% | — | 51/55 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 60.9% | 66.1% | 49.4% | 55.3% | 39.5% | 59.2% | 35.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Liam Broady | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1503 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1484 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1488 | 94.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1469 | 95.1 | -6.56 | +3.14 | 0.417 | 34.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1473 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1481 | 103.6 | -0.62 | -3.21 | 0.789 | 47.0% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -0.63 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.09 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1485 | 110.1 | +2.59 | +0.59 | 0.714 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.84 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1584 | 120.3 | +0.83 | +0.38 | 1.113 | 52.3% | +25 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.80 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.08 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1545 | 109.1 | -2.66 | +1.05 | 0.674 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -2.28 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.11 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 | 2019 | 1560 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 | 2020 | 1552 | 98.9 | -0.97 | +1.89 | 0.625 | 43.6% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 | 2021 | 1617 | 117.6 | -1.01 | -0.05 | 0.964 | 49.6% | -40 | — | -52 | 48.3% | -0.14 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.05 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 | 2022 | 1726 | 125.7 | -0.85 | -1.52 | 0.850 | 48.1% | -10 | — | -67 | 43.2% | -0.46 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | -0.28 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 | 2023 | 1685 | 116.3 | -2.36 | 0.00 | 0.912 | 48.7% | +24 | — | -14 | 47.1% | -0.12 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–0 | — | +0.59 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1779 | 145.0 | -0.88 | +2.63 | 1.057 | 51.2% | +42 | -74 | -137 | 56.3% | +0.39 | 4–8 (33%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | -0.06 | 2024 | 1586 | 108.2 | -2.47 | -1.66 | 0.873 | 48.8% | +36 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1528 | 94.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.90 | +1.98 | 1.006 | 50.0% | +8 | -49 | -86 | 48.9% | -0.06 | 38–38 (50%) | 62–53 (54%) | 105.3 | -2.45 | — | 1734 | 117.6 | -1.36 | -0.44 | 0.868 | 48.0% | +2 | — | -39 | 41.3% | -0.53 | 9–10 (47%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.2 | -0.43 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Mannarino | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 22, 2023 | H2H |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 3, 2024 | H2H |
| Damir Dzumhur | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 20, 2023 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 1, 2022 | H2H |
| Alex de Minaur | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 3, 2022 | H2H |