H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Liam Broady H2H: 1-1
Botic van de Zandschulp and Liam Broady are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on grass, while Liam Broady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2024 Wimbledon first round 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Liam Broady | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2022* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Liam Broady | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2020 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Liam Broady | 7-6(5) 7-6(8) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Liam Broady | #198 | #93 | 657 | 1,725 | 19 | 33 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Liam Broady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #885 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #301 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #163 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #546 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |