H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Maximilian Marterer H2H: 1-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Maximilian Marterer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2023 Pune quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Germany
Age 31
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2023* | Pune | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 6-2 | Maximilian Marterer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maximilian Marterer | #740 | #45 | 1,022 | 1,812 | 37 | 78 | 32.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Maximilian Marterer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #239 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #209 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #184 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #739 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |