H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Mikael Ymer H2H: 2-1
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–1 lead over Mikael Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay, while Mikael Ymer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2025 Nordea Open third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2025* | Nordea Open | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 6-1 | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2023* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mikael Ymer | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2023* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mikael Ymer | #626 | #50 | 981 | 1,861 | 58 | 74 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Mikael Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #94 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |