H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brad Drewett vs Rod Frawley H2H: 2-1
Brad Drewett holds a 2–1 lead over Rod Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Brad Drewett leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Brad Drewett won the 1984 Melbourne Indoor fourth round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1984* | Melbourne Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Brad Drewett | 6-3 7-6 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1981* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Rod Frawley | 7-6 7-6 | Brad Drewett | Match data |
| Dec 23, 1977* | Australian Open (2) | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Brad Drewett | 7-6 6-2 6-7 2-6 6-2 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Drewett | #1,018 | #34 | 170 | 1,763 | 181 | 225 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Rod Frawley | #483 | #43 | 0 | 1,812 | 112 | 145 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Drewett | Rod Frawley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #187 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #133 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1982 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #133 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #173 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #75 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #86 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #163 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #44 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1988 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #99 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #87 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #151 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #100 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #583 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |