H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Brad Gilbert vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-0
Brad Gilbert holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brad Gilbert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brad Gilbert won the 1994 Tokyo Outdoor fourth round 7-6(6) 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1994* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Brad Gilbert | 7-6(6) 6-7(3) 6-3 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Gilbert | #1,263 | #4 | 1,786 | 2,053 | 502 | 275 | 64.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Gilbert | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #62 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #18 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,009 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #13 | 1,968 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 17 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #10 | 1,952 | 0 | 20 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 20 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1992 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 20 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1993 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #76 | 1,621 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #680 | 1,559 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |