H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brian Fairlie vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 1-2
Andres Gimeno holds a 2–1 lead over Brian Fairlie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Brian Fairlie leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andres Gimeno leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andres Gimeno won the 1971 Miami Wct third round UNK.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1971* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andres Gimeno | UNK | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1971* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Brian Fairlie | 5-7 7-6(2) 7-6(6) | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1969* | London / Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Andres Gimeno | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Fairlie | #332 | #24 | 0 | 1,916 | 233 | 220 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andres Gimeno | #150 | #49 | 0 | 2,038 | 246 | 131 | 65.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brian Fairlie | Andres Gimeno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 20–29 | 40.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 13–27 | 32.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1973 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #58 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #66 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #36 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #92 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1978 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 48–27 | 64.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #332 | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 45–26 | 63.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 53–23 | 69.7% | — | 1,899 | 1 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #136 | 1,792 | 1 | 12 |