H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Brian Fairlie vs Hans Jurgen Pohmann H2H: 2-0
Brian Fairlie holds a 2–0 lead over Hans Jurgen Pohmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brian Fairlie leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brian Fairlie won the 1976 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 79
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1976* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Brian Fairlie | 6-4 6-0 | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1975* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R128 | Carpet | Brian Fairlie | 6-0 6-1 | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Fairlie | #332 | #24 | 0 | 1,916 | 233 | 220 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hans Jurgen Pohmann | #511 | #30 | 0 | 1,802 | 119 | 125 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brian Fairlie | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1970 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1971 | 20–29 | 40.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1972 | 13–27 | 32.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1973 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #58 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1975 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #66 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #44 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1976 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #36 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #74 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1977 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #92 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1978 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #332 | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #284 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |