H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brian Fairlie vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 0-2
Ion Tiriac holds a 2–0 lead over Brian Fairlie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1971 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-3 7-9 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ion Tiriac | 6-3 6-3 7-9 8-6 | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1970* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 8-6 1-6 6-3 | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Fairlie | #332 | #24 | 0 | 1,916 | 233 | 220 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brian Fairlie | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 20–29 | 40.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 13–27 | 32.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1973 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #58 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #66 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #36 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #92 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1978 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #332 | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |