H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Byron Bertram vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 1-4
Ion Tiriac holds a 4–1 lead over Byron Bertram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 3–0 on clay, while Byron Bertram leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1978 Johannesburg third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1978* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ion Tiriac | 6-2 6-4 | Byron Bertram | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1977* | Baltimore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Byron Bertram | 6-4 6-2 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1973* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-2 6-2 | Byron Bertram | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1973* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-2 6-2 | Byron Bertram | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1970* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-2 6-1 6-3 | Byron Bertram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Bertram | #150 | #51 | 0 | 1,810 | 113 | 138 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Bertram | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #152 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #156 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #120 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #219 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #150 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |