H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Byron Black vs Alberto Martin H2H: 2-0
Byron Black holds a 2–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 2001 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Byron Black | 6-1 6-1 6-0 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2000* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Byron Black | 6-3 6-2 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |