H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Byron Black vs Andrew Ilie H2H: 1-1
Byron Black and Andrew Ilie are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 1–0 on grass, while Andrew Ilie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 2000 Wimbledon first round 6-3 5-7 7-6(4) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Byron Black | 6-3 5-7 7-6(4) 6-0 | Andrew Ilie | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1999* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrew Ilie | 6-4 7-6(8) | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrew Ilie | #856 | #38 | 997 | 1,739 | 89 | 114 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Andrew Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #346 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #50 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #66 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |