H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Byron Black vs Brad Gilbert H2H: 0-1
Brad Gilbert holds a 1–0 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brad Gilbert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brad Gilbert won the 1994 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1994* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Brad Gilbert | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Brad Gilbert | #1,263 | #4 | 1,786 | 2,053 | 502 | 275 | 64.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Brad Gilbert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #62 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #18 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,009 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #13 | 1,968 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #10 | 1,952 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 20 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #76 | 1,621 | 0 | 20 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #680 | 1,559 | 0 | 20 |