H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Byron Black vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-1

Byron Black and Cedric Pioline are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on clay, while Byron Black leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Byron Black won the 2001 Queen's Club third round 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Byron Black
ZIM Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 2001* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Byron Black #64 6-4 7-6(3) Cedric Pioline #70 Match data
May 14, 1997* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #33 6-4 6-3 Byron Black #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Byron Black #876 #22 1,283 1,870 239 229 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Byron Black Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1991 2–3 40.0% #123 1,521 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1992 10–18 35.7% #142 1,544 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1993 19–20 48.7% #84 1,662 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1994 22–26 45.8% #66 1,732 0 0 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1995 28–24 53.8% #40 1,832 0 0 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1996 34–26 56.7% #44 1,747 0 1 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1997 27–24 52.9% #76 1,724 0 1 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1998 37–25 59.7% #28 1,738 0 1 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1999 24–23 51.1% #65 1,690 0 2 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2000 27–24 52.9% #35 1,697 0 2 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2001 8–13 38.1% #196 1,647 0 2 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #317 1,634 0 2 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5