H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Byron Black vs Henrik Holm H2H: 2-1
Byron Black holds a 2–1 lead over Henrik Holm in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Henrik Holm leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1996 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Byron Black | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Henrik Holm | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1995* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Henrik Holm | 6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | Byron Black | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1994* | Washington | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Byron Black | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Henrik Holm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Henrik Holm | #585 | #17 | 1,447 | 1,853 | 96 | 108 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Henrik Holm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #137 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #48 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #476 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |