H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Byron Black vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 1-2
Jacco Eltingh holds a 2–1 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1996 Newport third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 1996* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Byron Black | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jacco Eltingh | 6-2 6-4 6-4 | Byron Black | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1994* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Jacco Eltingh | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |