H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Byron Black vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 3-1
Byron Black holds a 3–1 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 3–0 on grass, while Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 2000 Nottingham semifinal 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2000* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Byron Black | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Byron Black | 7-5 6-4 7-5 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1998* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Byron Black | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1998* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 5-7 7-5 7-6(7) | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |