H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Byron Black vs Javier Frana H2H: 1-1
Byron Black and Javier Frana are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Javier Frana leads 1–0 on grass, while Byron Black leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1996 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1996* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Byron Black | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Javier Frana | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1995* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Javier Frana | 7-6(2) 7-5 | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Javier Frana | #527 | #30 | 944 | 1,904 | 154 | 148 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Javier Frana | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #143 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #174 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #67 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #145 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–10 | 67.7% | #49 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #111 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #58 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #80 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,675 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |