H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Byron Black vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-0

Byron Black holds a 3–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Byron Black won the 2000 Hamburg Masters second round 7-5 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Byron Black
ZIM Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Byron Black #65 7-5 3-6 6-4 Jeff Tarango #62 Match data
Nov 13, 1999* Moscow ATP 250 SF Carpet Byron Black #80 6-3 6-2 Jeff Tarango #73 Match data
Jul 19, 1995* Washington ATP 250 R64 Hard Byron Black #58 6-3 5-7 6-3 Jeff Tarango #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Byron Black #876 #22 1,283 1,870 239 229 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Byron Black Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1991 2–3 40.0% #123 1,521 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1992 10–18 35.7% #142 1,544 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1993 19–20 48.7% #84 1,662 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1994 22–26 45.8% #66 1,732 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1995 28–24 53.8% #40 1,832 0 0 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1996 34–26 56.7% #44 1,747 0 1 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1997 27–24 52.9% #76 1,724 0 1 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1998 37–25 59.7% #28 1,738 0 1 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1999 24–23 51.1% #65 1,690 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2000 27–24 52.9% #35 1,697 0 2 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2001 8–13 38.1% #196 1,647 0 2 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #317 1,634 0 2 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2