H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Byron Black vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-1

Byron Black holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1995 New Haven second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Byron Black
ZIM Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 1995* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Byron Black #71 6-1 6-2 Jim Grabb #129 Match data
Jul 7, 1994* Newport ATP 250 R32 Grass Byron Black #87 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 Jim Grabb #125 Match data
Apr 16, 1992* Hong Kong ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Grabb #74 6-3 3-6 6-2 Byron Black #101 Match data
Jun 12, 1991* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass Byron Black #367 6-2 7-6(5) Jim Grabb #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Byron Black #876 #22 1,283 1,870 239 229 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Byron Black Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1991 2–3 40.0% #123 1,521 0 0 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1992 10–18 35.7% #142 1,544 0 0 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1993 19–20 48.7% #84 1,662 0 0 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1994 22–26 45.8% #66 1,732 0 0 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1995 28–24 53.8% #40 1,832 0 0 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1996 34–26 56.7% #44 1,747 0 1 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1
27 1997 27–24 52.9% #76 1,724 0 1 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1
28 1998 37–25 59.7% #28 1,738 0 1 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2
29 1999 24–23 51.1% #65 1,690 0 2 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 2000 27–24 52.9% #35 1,697 0 2 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2
31 2001 8–13 38.1% #196 1,647 0 2 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #317 1,634 0 2 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2