H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Byron Black vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 0-1
Jimmy Connors holds a 1–0 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jimmy Connors leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1992 Tokyo Outdoor second round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1992* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jimmy Connors | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jimmy Connors | #1,295 | #1 | 875 | 2,410 | 1,262 | 294 | 81.1% | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 99 | 109 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Jimmy Connors | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 76–25 | 75.2% | — | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 86–16 | 84.3% | #3 | 2,152 | 0 | 17 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 95–6 | 94.1% | #1 | 2,301 | 3 | 32 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 79–10 | 88.8% | #1 | 2,260 | 3 | 41 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 97–8 | 92.4% | #1 | 2,370 | 4 | 53 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 69–15 | 82.1% | #1 | 2,271 | 4 | 61 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 67–6 | 91.8% | #1 | 2,326 | 5 | 71 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 78–12 | 86.7% | #2 | 2,272 | 5 | 79 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 73–15 | 83.0% | #3 | 2,197 | 5 | 85 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 59–12 | 83.1% | #2 | 2,162 | 5 | 89 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 78–11 | 87.6% | #2 | 2,263 | 7 | 96 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 52–11 | 82.5% | #3 | 2,193 | 8 | 100 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 69–12 | 85.2% | #2 | 2,240 | 8 | 105 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #4 | 2,133 | 8 | 105 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #8 | 2,013 | 8 | 105 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #4 | 1,985 | 8 | 105 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #7 | 2,020 | 8 | 107 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #14 | 1,957 | 8 | 109 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,881 | 8 | 109 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #49 | 1,887 | 8 | 109 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #84 | 1,774 | 8 | 109 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #370 | 1,717 | 8 | 109 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #672 | 1,681 | 8 | 109 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,673 | 8 | 109 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,665 | 8 | 109 |