H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Byron Black vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 1-0
Byron Black holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Stark in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Byron Black leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1998 Tokyo second round 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1998* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Byron Black | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |