H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Byron Black vs Karim Alami H2H: 2-0
Byron Black holds a 2–0 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 2000 Scottsdale third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2000* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Byron Black | 6-2 6-3 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1999* | London | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Byron Black | 6-1 1-6 7-6(4) | Karim Alami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Karim Alami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |