H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Byron Black vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 0-1
Luiz Mattar holds a 1–0 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1992 Casablanca third round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1992* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |