Byron Black
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jan 17, 2001 | H2H |
| Marcelo Rios | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 4, 2001 | H2H |
| Gianluca Pozzi | 7 | 1 | 8 | Jul 5, 2000 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jan 22, 1999 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 10, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Luiz Mattar holds a 1–0 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1992 Casablanca round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Byron Black | Match data | Mar 19, 1992* | R32 | Casablanca | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,873 | 240 | 230 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #44 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Byron Black | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 21 | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1994 | 14 | 17 | 31 | 45.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1995 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% |
| 26 | 1996 | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% |
| 27 | 1997 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1998 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2000 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 2001 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 32 | 2002 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 139 | 140 | 279 | 49.8% | 12 | 22 | 34 | 35.3% | 53 | 35 | 88 | 60.2% | 36 | 33 | 69 | 52.2% | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 381/470 of Byron Black's and 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Byron Black | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 1991 | 4/5 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 56.1% | 63.3% | 48.1% | 30.0% | 32.9% | 56.7% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 21/28 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 60.8% | 64.6% | 50.3% | 49.1% | 40.0% | 58.9% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 36/39 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 60.3% | 64.1% | 48.9% | 55.0% | 49.1% | 57.8% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 42/48 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 57.5% | 67.6% | 49.1% | 56.6% | 44.7% | 59.6% | 37.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 40/52 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 60.8% | 70.9% | 51.6% | 57.0% | 39.7% | 63.4% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 47/62 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 60.1% | 65.3% | 50.9% | 57.2% | 48.7% | 59.4% | 37.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 41/51 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 57.5% | 68.7% | 51.7% | 56.7% | 44.2% | 61.2% | 41.1% | 1991 | 36/41 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 58.4% | 66.6% | 49.4% | 53.2% | 43.5% | 59.5% | 37.0% |
| 28 | 1998 | 46/62 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 60.0% | 68.6% | 52.1% | 59.0% | 43.0% | 62.0% | 40.8% | 1992 | 34/38 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 56.2% | 71.6% | 53.0% | 64.9% | 45.9% | 63.5% | 37.5% |
| 29 | 1999 | 42/47 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 59.3% | 68.9% | 51.3% | 59.2% | 37.1% | 61.8% | 38.3% | 1993 | 35/41 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 55.1% | 69.5% | 50.3% | 59.1% | 40.1% | 60.7% | 35.3% |
| 30 | 2000 | 40/51 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 62.1% | 70.9% | 53.0% | 60.1% | 42.1% | 64.1% | 40.4% | 1994 | 28/38 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 59.1% | 67.2% | 50.6% | 55.4% | 35.7% | 60.5% | 36.2% |
| 31 | 2001 | 20/21 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 64.3% | 65.2% | 51.4% | 50.5% | 42.5% | 60.0% | 34.9% | 1995 | 10/10 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 61.4% | 61.9% | 57.0% | 69.4% | 53.6% | 60.1% | 28.4% |
| 32 | 2002 | 2/4 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 66.7% | 62.0% | 42.4% | 43.7% | 55.6% | 54.9% | 29.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Byron Black | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 21 | 1991 | 1521 | 104.2 | -1.02 | -0.06 | 0.821 | 45.3% | +14 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.83 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 1545 | 120.6 | -1.55 | +0.16 | 0.935 | 48.9% | +19 | — | +38 | 39.1% | -0.64 | 2–6 (25%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | +0.55 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1663 | 132.7 | -3.10 | +1.66 | 0.948 | 49.0% | -11 | — | -11 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +1.18 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1735 | 137.9 | -1.20 | +0.09 | 0.933 | 48.6% | 0 | — | -52 | 44.4% | -0.50 | 8–4 (67%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -1.35 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1834 | 141.6 | +1.31 | +1.27 | 1.043 | 50.6% | -19 | -332 | -108 | 53.3% | -0.04 | 9–9 (50%) | 17–8 (68%) | — | -0.98 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1747 | 135.8 | -2.17 | +0.51 | 0.929 | 48.8% | +32 | -274 | -13 | 51.4% | -0.06 | 13–5 (72%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | +0.90 | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1724 | 143.0 | -0.46 | +2.90 | 1.057 | 51.0% | +19 | -166 | +77 | 51.6% | +0.20 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | -1.28 | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1738 | 141.5 | +0.32 | +2.69 | 1.074 | 51.1% | -11 | -159 | +112 | 57.4% | +0.59 | 10–8 (56%) | 8–12 (40%) | — | +1.98 | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1691 | 138.9 | -0.27 | +0.43 | 1.001 | 49.9% | +27 | -63 | +73 | 48.7% | 0.00 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | +0.97 | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 |
| 30 | 2000 | 1711 | 136.3 | +1.49 | +2.31 | 1.126 | 52.1% | -21 | -150 | +129 | 53.6% | +0.51 | 6–8 (43%) | 9–14 (39%) | — | +1.00 | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1652 | 123.1 | -1.09 | -1.12 | 0.873 | 47.9% | -23 | — | +160 | 36.7% | -0.80 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -1.02 | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1637 | 107.3 | -2.90 | -0.76 | 0.651 | 44.4% | +5 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1873 | 141.2 | -0.61 | +1.24 | 0.995 | 49.9% | +4 | -184 | +41 | 49.9% | 0.00 | 69–57 (55%) | 86–88 (49%) | 103.5 | +0.38 | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jan 17, 2001 | H2H |
| Marcelo Rios | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 4, 2001 | H2H |
| Gianluca Pozzi | 7 | 1 | 8 | Jul 5, 2000 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jan 22, 1999 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 10, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |